Kontext
Die Ostafrikanische Rohölpipeline (East African Crude Oil Pipeline, EACOP) ist eine 1.443 Kilometer lange Pipeline, die die Erdölvorkommen Ugandas mit Tansania verbinden soll, um den Export von Rohöl zu ermöglichen. Der Bau dieses Projekts bringt jedoch tiefgreifende ökologische und sozioökonomische Veränderungen mit sich, die erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Lebensgrundlagen, Landrechte und die alltägliche Sicherheit der lokalen Bevölkerung haben. Das Interview ist nur auf englischer Sprache verfügbar.
What can people in Europe learn from a Grassroots Human Rights Defender in Uganda?
Nakato Hope: To our peers in Europe, understanding the intersection of our local context, gender protections, and domestic legal frameworks is vital for meaningful international solidarity. One of the core areas of our grassroots activism here in Uganda centers entirely on the survival of rural communities, with a strict focus on sustainable land use and community-driven environmental defense. This is our primary focus. We work tirelessly to support local smallholders navigating rapid infrastructural changes, ensuring that the corporate footprint does not lead to household economic instability.
Rural girls and women bear the heaviest brunt of these environmental and land transitions because women serve as the primary food producers and water gatherers for their families. Along the corridor, we face unique structural challenges. For example, many rural families have historically occupied inherited ancestral plots without possessing formal title deeds or registration paperwork. When land assessments occur, navigating the fair and timely compensation processes required by national law becomes an immense challenge for these undocumented households. GWEF stands up directly for these families. We provide essential legal literacy, build grassroots capacity, and ensure that no vulnerable household or marginalized woman is left invisible or unprotected.
"We are complementing domestic legal frameworks to protect the well-being of local families"
Nakato Hope: Individual community members face significant bottlenecks when it comes to accessing formal justice, often due to limited legal funds or a lack of familiarity with domestic administrative structures. While free legal aid services exist regionally, breaking the isolation of remote rural villages and connecting these families to legitimate legal mechanisms remains a massive task. Beyond that, there is a vital need to combat legal illiteracy at the grassroots level. Many community members do not know how or where to formally lodge a grievance when their land or livelihoods are affected.
This lack of information leaves families highly vulnerable. For instance, when large-scale infrastructure corridors alter local economies, we frequently document sharp spikes in domestic vulnerabilities and Gender-Based Violence (GBV). In many transit villages, the promise of sudden monetary compensation has inadvertently disrupted family cohesion, leading to cases where traditional household support structures break down, leaving women and children displaced. Furthermore, when localized land clearances compromise rural farming plots and disrupt community water access points, the daily burden falls completely back onto women and young girls. They are forced to travel long, unsafe distances just to secure clean water for domestic use and small-scale crop irrigation.
Our female youth-led movement is not acting in opposition to the state; rather, we are standing up for compliance, fairness, and the basic well-being of our community members because we are their grassroots voice. We anchor our advocacy entirely within local governance channels and national rights frameworks, ensuring that regional and international corporate accountability standards are upheld at the village level.
How can international partners and European mechanisms provide strategic support?
Nakato Hope: When analyzing the operational landscapes and environmental transitions here in Uganda, grassroots women defenders face distinct socio-economic risks, including administrative hurdles and localized friction. To build lasting resilience, it is absolutely critical to direct flexible, targeted funding streams toward local and national women human rights defenders' networks. These grassroots structures are the most effective mechanisms for breaking the isolation of rural defenders through peer-led capacity building, legal first aid, and collective community protection.
In terms of how European countries and global civil society can stand in true solidarity with us, the most powerful tool is institutional visibility and constructive advocacy. European governments can utilize established human rights defender mechanisms to provide robust, flexible, and emergency institutional support to frontline, youth-led collectives. Furthermore, we must continue demanding transparent corporate accountability from multinational energy firms. Global regulatory frameworks must ensure that companies originating in Europe are held fully accountable to international human rights and environmental standards throughout their entire global supply chains.
We have seen firsthand that international accountability mechanisms yield real results. For example, the resolutions previously passed by the European Union Parliament played a monumental role. Because grassroots actors were able to meet with delegates and share verified field data on an individual basis, those resolutions directly addressed the core issues—touching on government accountability, corporate compliance, and local rights protection. When those standards are emphasized globally, the positive impacts ripple down immediately, leading to tangible improvements in human rights compliance and community safety right at our local village level. If international bodies continue to strengthen these local accountability frameworks, it will be a major plus for protecting girls and women along the energy corridor.